logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.09.15 2015나18007
손해배상
Text

1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to that part is dismissed.

2...

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a company that constructed the Seo-gu Incheon apartment B (hereinafter “instant apartment”)

(2) The Plaintiff subcontracted the portion of reinforced concrete construction work among the instant apartment construction work to the Round Construction Business Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Round Construction Business”).

The defendant is C of the roadside building industry, with 10 to 20 workers from March 2010 to November 201, and with 801 and 802 of the apartment of this case.

B. According to the construction detailed drawings of the instant apartment building 801 unit (which seems to have been changed to 361 unit thereafter) of the instant apartment building with the omission of the construction of the steel bars of 801 unit (the apartment building of this case is deemed to have been changed to 361 unit thereafter), in order to enhance the earthquake-proof performance, six lines (the steel bars consisting of a string line in X-ray) should be depthd on the front door of the first floor.

However, around June 2010, the work workers who the defendant turns out were performing the construction work in this part, and the five lines of steel bars (the estimated quantity of steel bars is about 20).

In the course of supervision, the construction has been carried out as it is without revealed the non-execution of part of such steel bars.

C. According to the construction detailed drawings of the apartment of this case 803 apartment building of this case where the construction of the steel bars of this case 803 apartment building of this case was omitted, 8 lines (64 steel bars) around the 24th floor (in the case of the apartment of this case where there was a structure called Belgium-wall to enhance the resistance to the underwater load of the apartment of this case which is a super high-rise, without the placement of a household over one floor) should be depthd on the 24th floor (in the case where there was a structure called Belgium-wall to enhance the resistance to the underwater load of the apartment of this case).

In March 201, however, in the process of this part of the construction, only 4 lines have been actually constructed (the estimated quantity of non-explosive steel).

In the course of supervision, the construction was carried out as it was without revealed the non-execution of such non-executions.

As above, this case.

arrow