(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.03.19 2019고정618

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.03.19 2019고정618

폭행

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 09:50 on October 21, 2018, the Defendant assaulted the victim, such as the victim B (nives, 32 years of age) and the husband’s marital relationship, stating that the Defendant was unable to use the toilet from the toilets located in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul on the ground that the fishery harbor was driven in the toilets located in Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, and that it was impossible for the victim to use the toilet, thereby making the victim take a bath for the victim, shouldering the lusium, and bruing the lusium, and making the victim feel the lusium.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. The results of the CD recycling audience;

1. The police statement in B was made by the defendant and the defense counsel about the date of the instant case, and there was no fact that the defendant left the toilet floor to the victim. However, there are some some ambiguous parts about the evidence in the judgment, especially the fact that the defendant was faced with the victim's getting in the ward and what he was the defendant's getting in the kitchen, but it appears to be natural after the lapse of one year, and it appears to be natural after the lapse of one year, as a whole, the statement of the victim in a concrete and consistent manner as to the present situation and key part, and sound "I must have a shoulder" during the dispute between the defendant and the first ward at the time (the result of the CD reproduction), and the fact that the defendant left the bar in the presence of the victim during the dispute between the victim and the inside, can be recognized as being applying the law to cremation in the presence of the victim.

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment.

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

참조조문

유사 판례

-제주지방법원 2020.09.23 2020고단1799

-서울서부지방법원 2019.12.19 2019노1076

-울산지방법원 2020.01.16 2019노324

-수원지방법원 안양지원 2017.11.30 2017고단579

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.04.01 2015고단146