1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A and B are parents of the network D (hereinafter “the deceased”), Plaintiff C are those of the deceased, and the Defendant is a juristic person that operates the Ssystic Health Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) located in 119, 1926, 199, Gwangju City (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

B. On December 17, 2013, Plaintiff A hospitalized the Deceased at Defendant Hospital on February 12, 2014 to raise an objection by proving that the Deceased suffers from mental illness, who received a notice of convening a social work personnel call from the Military Manpower Administration on January 10, 2014.

C. On February 18, 2014, the medical professionals of the Defendant Hospital had the deceased live in the four-person room, and examined the progress thereof. On February 18, 2014, the deceased used four-person rooms, which are currently no other patient, but are strings with strings and rooms, and demanded the deceased to take off the room as one-person room. On February 5, 2014, the medical professionals of the Defendant Hospital diagnosed the deceased’s sick name as Schchlrenia and mental division.

On March 11, 2014, the Deceased attempted to commit suicide by hanging a hand on the toilet door in the hospital room. On the same day, the nurse of the Defendant Hospital visited the Deceased’s sick room for medication at around 20:45 pupper on the same day, and discovered the Deceased who had no beer and pulmonary resuscitation, and performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and then sent the Deceased to the emergency room in the Gangnam-gu Scupbro Hospital on the same day at around 20:57 of the same day, but the Deceased was unable to recover from beer and pulmonary care.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 9, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 7, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs' assertion that the defendant had a duty to prevent suicide or self-harm of both a psychiatrist and a patient, but is not able to directly monitor the inside of the room hospitalized by the deceased. The defendant did not design the toilet door for the prevention of suicide. The plaintiff's assertion that the deceased had a duty to prevent suicide or self-harm.