logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2018.01.26 2015가합105383
손해배상(의)
Text

1. On November 15, 2015, the Defendant: (a) filed a claim against Plaintiff A for KRW 6,00,000 for each of the said KRW 12,917,979; and (b) filed a claim against Plaintiff B and C for each of the said KRW 6,000.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The parties concerned as to the plaintiff A is the wife of E (FFs, hereinafter the deceased), the plaintiff B and C are the children of the deceased, and the plaintiffs are the co-inheritors of the deceased.

The defendant is a doctor who performed and treated a surgery on the deceased.

B. On November 10, 2015, the Deceased’s hospital’s hospitalization and accident guard 1) The Deceased’s Gwon operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant member”).

(2) At around 12:35 on November 15, 2015, the Deceased was hospitalized in the hospital room 807 of the instant Assembly member for recovery after performing a surgery for cutting off the left side scams, in order to treat the chronic alley infection due to urology (hereinafter “instant accident”). On the same day, around 13:11 on the same day, the Deceased left the hospital for the purpose of recovery. (3) On November 15, 201, at around 13:11, she was found to have cryped and scrokeed at the entrance of the toilet (hereinafter “instant accident”).

A restaurant employee of the instant member who initially discovered the deceased was a worker on duty.

H confirmed whether the deceased was aware of his consciousness, and at the time, the deceased was under a weak respiratory state without consciousness.

around that time, the assistant nurse I, who was scheduled to shift work, shall also have moved the deceased to the sick room using wheelchairs.

3) The I called to the Defendant, and explained the situation of the instant accident that the deceased was found to have been used in front of the toilet without consciousness, and that he was transferred to the sick room. After that, I and H had the Defendant secured the deceased’s ability until this time, and have taken measures to confirm, remove, and connect the body of the deceased, maintain the body and take charge of the deceased’s body. 4) At around 14:03, the Defendant arrived at the Assembly member of the instant case and carried out cardiopulmonary resuscitation after having arrived at the deceased.

After the arrival of the 119 rescue team members, the 119 rescue team members carried out cardiopulmonary resuscitation, but it was not confirmed by the deceased, and the defendant is a shipping substitute hospital for the Human Resources University (hereinafter referred to as the "Maritime substitute Hospital").

arrow