1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. On November 6, 2013, the network A (hereinafter “the network”) asserting the cause of the plaintiffs’ claim received an operation after receiving a type diagnosis from the F Hospital run by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) Einology.

On January 14, 2014, the Deceased was diagnosed as “satisfying of memory without any special abnormal opinion” even though he/she was examined by the Gal branch of the Defendant Hospital on January 14, 2014.

Since then, the deceased received psychotropic treatment from the Defendant Hospital, and on March 31, 2014, the patriate and professor of the Defendant Hospital performed a simple stamp test for the selection of dementia, etc., and only prescribed drugs.

around 16:00 on April 8, 2014, the Deceased was used in the emergency room of the Defendant hospital. A worker on duty was aware of the “infeasible symptoms caused by the use of his/her surgery and medicine” and refused hospitalization only because he/she merely caused the Deceased to undergo outpatient treatment.

around 11:00 on April 9, 2014, the deceased’s family members moved to the Macheon National University Hospital (hereinafter “Sacheon National University Hospital”), and the above hospital immediately hospitalized the deceased and conducted brain-related testing and conducted a diagnosis that “viral viral viral viral chronosis and its liver infections caused by viral viral viral viral tyrosis” to the deceased, and conducted an anti-viral viral viral chral chral chral chralthral dralthrosis treatment.

The Deceased was hospitalized in a hospital of Nonparty 2 and a department of mental health, but not cognitive disorders, etc., and the Deceased was discharged from the hospital of Nonparty 2 and died due to a merger of fladism on December 23, 2015 while the Deceased resided in the hospital of Nonparty 2.

① Although the Deceased complained of the “exploitation and the occurrence of an influence”, the Defendant Hospital and the professor performed only an inspection for dementia with simple dementia without any doubt as to the possibility of viral infection.