(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.12.21 2015고단3933

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.12.21 2015고단3933

사기

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Justice] On October 16, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud at the District Court of Jung-gu on the part of October 16, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 24, 2015.

[2015 Highest 3933] On July 11, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that the Defendant would send a ticket if he/she sent money to the victim by visiting the victim with a notice to the effect that the victim B purchases the saves in the “China Highest Ba” car page prepared by the victim B at an inficial place located in the Government of the Gyeonggi-do Government, and that the victim B would send the ticket.

However, the defendant was not in possession of the above diskettes, and there was no intention or ability to sell it to the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 50,000 won from the victim to the corporate bank account (C) in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

[2015 Highest 4272]

1. Around June 10, 2015, the Defendant posted a notice to the effect that “D Pestet 2 tickets are sold” on the D Pestet “Natas” camera, and made a false statement to the effect that “the Defendant would send a ticket to the victim E who reported and contacted the notice.”

However, the defendant was not in possession of the above diskettes, and there was no intention or ability to sell it to the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received from the victim the transfer of KRW 100,000 to the virtual account at 11 another bank on the same day.

2. Around June 10, 2015, the Defendant posted a notice to the effect that “F shareholder preferential treatment rights are sold” on the NAV “China” car page, and made a false statement to the effect that the Defendant would send a ticket to the victim G who reported and contacted with the notice.”

However, the defendant was not in possession of the above diskettes, and there was no intention or ability to sell it to the victim.

Nevertheless, the defendant transfers 200,000 won from the victim to the new cooperation account under the name of the defendant on the same day.

유사 판례

-서울동부지방법원 2015.11.26 2015고단2693

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.12.23 2015고정1671

-서울서부지방법원 2016.11.30 2016고단2391

-인천지방법원 2014.10.01 2013고단5327

-부산지방법원 2015.11.25 2014고단2468