logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.11.20 2013고단2607
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A and C Imprisonment for 10 months, each of the defendants B, D and E shall be punished by imprisonment for 8 months.

except that this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, from September 3, 2013 to October 8, 2013, operated a game room with the trade name of the fourth floor of H building 402 of Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, and “IPC bank,” Defendant: (a) installed 30 points, which are game products not classified; and (b) had customers who find the place enter 200 points per 10,000 points in cash; and (c) had customers who find the place enter the point at 10,000 points in cash; and (d) had them hold a game by means of obtaining points in accordance with the dividend rate of up to 1,00 times in cash; and (d) exchanged points obtained through the result of the game in cash after deducting 5% fees.

The defendant provided game products that have not been rated as above for use, and exchanged the results obtained through the use of game products for business purposes.

2. Defendants B, C, D, and E play an illegal game room business on the same date and time, at the same place, and even with knowledge of the fact that Defendants A runs the illegal game room business as above, Defendant B served as a chief of the business division, such as where Defendants B received KRW 70,000 per day and show customers who satisfing a plaque, Defendant C manages the proceeds of the game room in the Kakter, Defendant C served as managing the proceeds of the game room in the Kakter with monthly salary of KRW 1.5 million, Defendant D received KRW 150,000 per day, and Defendant E received KRW 70,000 per day and provided money to customers to explain the game method.

As such, the Defendants provided game products not rated A for use, and aided and aided the acts of exchanging results obtained through the use of game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Examination protocol of Defendant A by the prosecution;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against Defendants, J and K

1. Each written statement of L, M, N,O, P, Q, R, S, and T;

1. Seizure records;

1. As a result of the appraisal (I driver's license):

1. The investigation reports are sent and received by suspects E and D.

arrow