logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.05.01 2018나60764
채무부존재확인
Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following cases, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

[Attachment] Each "0.025%" in Part 3, Part 9, last 1, and Part 4, shall be deemed to be "2.5%".

Each "Witness C" of the 15th and 5th and 9th of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be considered as "Witness C of the first instance."

Part 3 of the judgment of the first instance court, Part 18 "C" shall be changed to "C".

If the first instance court is dismissed, the first instance court's "in this court" and the first instance court's "in this court" in the first instance court's "in this court" and the first instance court's "in this court" shall each be dismissed.

Part 4 of the first instance judgment, "0.025% per annum (0.03% per annum)" in Part 19 shall be "2.5% per annum (30%)."

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow