1. The plaintiffs' appeals against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

With respect to this case, this court's use is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition of each corresponding part as follows. Thus, this Court cites it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In the second page of the judgment of the court of first instance, " March 2, 2002" shall be read as " March 21, 2002."

From February 16, 2002 to March 2002, 2002, the court of first instance puts "from March 2002."

In the third part of the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the "Iart" in the fifth part shall be "I play."

The "35,010,000 won" in the 3th sentence of the first instance court shall be "35,01,000 won" in the 12th sentence.

In the first instance court’s decision, “No reason exists” in the 11th, 17, and 18th, following the first instance court’s decision: “Although it is assumed that Defendant D did not directly engage in the business of each of the above beams, or Defendant D was not entitled to the compensation for the business closure loss related to each of the above boats, unless the Plaintiffs are not the right holder entitled to the compensation for the business closure loss due to the receipt of the above amount of the compensation, it cannot be deemed that Defendant D’s receipt of the above amount of compensation.”

The "qualification standards, etc." in the last part of the 11th judgment of the court of first instance shall be "disqualifications, etc. of the operating entity".

On the 12th page 9 of the first instance judgment, “B” is added to “No evidence exists to deem that the Plaintiff obtained a license for or reported to operate an excursion ship business under his/her name with respect to each of the above boats under the former Excursion Ship and Ferry Business Act.”

Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is justified, and all appeals by the plaintiffs against the defendants are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.