logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.10.22 2019나2028728
공사대금
Text

The judgment of the first instance, including the claim extended by the plaintiff in this court, is modified as follows. A.

The defendant.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this part of the underlying facts is the same as the partial entry of “1. Basic Facts” to “1. Basic Facts” to “14, i.e., Chapter 2, 13 through 7, 14, except for the following modifications. As such, this part shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of

[Supplementary part] The part of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the instant construction contract" of the second to 18 shall be referred to as "the instant long-term contract" in all of the "the instant long-term contract."

Part 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance, from Part 1 to Part 7, "(b) of the construction contract of this case" has been amended as follows.

A person shall be appointed.

B. On November 3, 2004, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into the instant long-term continuing contract and each of the following contracts, and entered into each of the following contracts after entering into the instant long-term continuing contract. The details are as follows.

- 2,160 days after the start of October 8, 2010 on the aggregate of the 20.3rd day of the contract completion (the date of commencement shall be November 8, 2004; the date from October 9, 2004 to October 8, 201) of the 20. 3rd day of the 20. 8rd day of the 20. 1st day of the 20. 3rd day of the 20. 1st day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 2nd day of the 3rd day of the 2nd day of the 3rd day of the 2nd day of the 3rd day of the 2nd day of the 3rd day of the 20. 3rd day of the 2nd day of the 20. 3rd day of the 20. 3rd day of the 20. 3rd day of the 20. 20.

C. On February 19, 2008, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a contract for construction work on April 4, 201 (hereinafter “instant continuing expenditure contract”). On February 19, 2008, the Plaintiff and the Defendant changed the form of the instant construction work into the method of continuing expenditure contract, and entered into the contract by setting the total additional construction cost as KRW 97,404,00,000, and the date of completion as of April 4, 201 (hereinafter “instant continuing expenditure contract”).

After completion, the contract was entered into to change the term of completion.

The contents of the instant continuing expenditure contract and the instant modified contract are as listed below 2:

5. Serial.

arrow