The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds for appeal (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The facts that the defendant confessions the crime of this case and reflects it are favorable. However, the defendant pretended to have sold goods by accessing the Niber "E site, and committed the crime of this case by deceiving the proceeds of goods from the victims about 40 times in total. The crime of this case is very poor in light of the method of crime, frequency of crime and the number of victims who committed repeatedly over a long period of time against many and unspecified persons, and there is no amount of damage, and the defendant does not take any measures to recover from damage until the trial. In particular, the defendant was punished as a fine of 70,000 won on April 24, 2013, a fine of 70,000 won on June 13, 2013, and a fine of 100,000 won on July 2, 2013, and the defendant continued to be subject to investigation by an investigative agency on certain criminal facts of this case, and even during the criminal acts of this case, the court below did not appear to have committed unlawful acts in the court below's summons.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.