logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.09.11 2018고단2567
위증
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

B On December 13, 2017, the Defendant, who is the seat of B, was detained by injury in the Busan District Court (the summary of the facts charged: around 21:30 on February 23, 2017, the Defendant was charged with the Defendant’s snow on the left side of the victim, resulting in the Defendant’s real name due to a knife of the snow on the left side, etc.) and was tried by the above court 2017 high 620 on December 13, 2017, and there was no fact that the Defendant, who is the seat of B, at the time, was flick of the Victim D for B.

The purpose of “proving was to perjury.”

Accordingly, on February 9, 2018, the defendant was present at the Busan District Court 351, the Busan District Court 351, which was located in the Busan District Court, around 14:30 on February 9, 2018, as a witness in the injury case against the defendant B, the above court 2017 High Gohap 620, and then the defendant was selected as a witness.

I do not need to answer the question "...."

The answer to “B” and “B” is all the satisfined with drinking in the state of fating fat.

The answer to the question " "," and the prosecutor's continued to see the whole process of fighting his body, even though there was a difference between 2 and 3 meters.

It is necessary to answer the question "...", and to conclude that there was no fact that the witness had shown the whole process of fighting with two people's body fighting.

The answer was made to the question “..”.

However, in fact, around February 23, 2017, at C Office around 21:30, there was a fact that the snow of D caused the real name of D by a knife to a knife with a knife with a knife with a knife with a knife, etc., and, at the time of the assault, the Defendant summoned it at the time of the assault site, and made a false testimony to the same effect.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Copies of each police statement made to D, E, or F;

1. A copy of each record;

1. A copy of the opinion of intention; and

arrow