The judgment below

Of them, the part on Defendant B shall be reversed.

Defendant

B A person shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

, however, the defendant.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In light of the fact that Defendant B’s defense counsel (inductively unfair) reflects the wrongness of Defendant B’s defense counsel through confinement life, the victim expressed his intention not to want the punishment of Defendant B, the economic situation of the Defendant is difficult and there is a family member to support, etc., the sentence of the lower court that sentenced 6 months of imprisonment is too unreasonable.

B. The prosecutor (misunderstanding of facts as to the acquittal portion of the Defendant C) consistently stated that the victim registered the cosmetic Education Institute “O (O; hereinafter the same shall apply)” by Defendant C and completed the “O” of the cosmetic Education Institute (O; hereinafter the same shall apply), but he/she may be employed in the Canadian beauty service provider “P” and consistently stated that he/she attended the Canadian cosmetic, and that the statement stated in the application for admission prepared by the Defendant when he/she registered with the dedicated institute of this case is based on the premise that the victim does not have the opportunity to be employed in P if the victim did not complete the above employment program.

Defendant

C has already been finally and conclusively convicted in fraud due to the fact that the instant private teaching institute was operated and obtained an international certificate from T to the effect that the students could be employed in the 'P' of beauty art chain located in Canada, and the victims had already been issued the said international certificate by the Defendant C.

It is possible for the victim to be employed P even without attending the employment program in the instant private teaching institute, and the contents posted on the website of the instant private teaching institute are irrelevant to employment in P as related to curriculum, tuition fees, etc.

On the other hand, in light of the developments leading up to the victim's finding of the instant private teaching institute and the details of the consultation, the Defendant C, not the victim, can enter the PP through any other means, instead of taking an employment program in the instant private teaching institute.