beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 47,697,440 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from August 27, 2015 to October 12, 2016.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is running a human resources presentation business related to the referral of technical employment to Korean nationals under the trade name of Canadian Docoo as “C” in Canada.
The defendant has run the service business related to the procurement and departure of Canadian employment human resources in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si D.
B. In around 2011, the Plaintiff entered Canada into a service agreement with the Defendant to act on behalf of the Plaintiff for the Plaintiff to work in Canada according to the desired occupation of human resources, and to receive fees from the Defendant, and maintained a continuous transaction relationship until 2013.
C. Around May 2012, the Plaintiff performed services for human resources that the Defendant entered Canada, and caused service fees of USD 45,000 to the Defendant. Around the end of 2013, the Plaintiff provided services for human resources (E,F, and G) that the Defendant entered Canada, thereby incurring service fees of USD 12,500 in Canada.
On the other hand, the exchange rate in Canada as of the date of the closing of the argument in this case is 851.74 won per USD 1 Canada.
【In the absence of dispute, the Defendant alleged that there was no evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, and 7 (including a paper number) of the evidence No. 1, but it is possible to find out by the statement Nos. 4 through 6, i.e., the document form of the evidence No. 1 (a document in the form of a JPG file attached to the e-mail sent by the Defendant to the Plaintiff on August 15, 2013) and the Defendant sent the Plaintiff the e-mail promising to pay the said money, the establishment of each of the above documents can be recognized.
each entry, the purport of the whole pleading
2. Determination
A. According to the factual basis of the judgment on the cause of the claim, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant shall conclude the argument of this case with USD 57,500 in Canada ($ 45,000) to the Plaintiff, barring any special circumstance.