logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.01.23 2013고정3282
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a general director of C.C.

1. Forging a private document;

A. At around August 20, 2008, the Defendant: (a) did not have been represented by the Chairperson E of the Promotion Committee for the purpose of exercising the contract within the office No. 503 of the building D in Jung-gu Seoul, Seoul; (b) did not have been represented by the Chairman of the Promotion Committee for the purpose of exercising the contract; (c) drafted a standard construction design contract between Han Afforestation and the Promotion Committee; and (d) “A” in the “C Promotion Committee” in the “C Promotion Committee E”, the “Chairperson E, Representative A, resident registration number column” in the “F, G”, and address column; and (d) forged one copy of the standard construction contract with the seal of the Chairperson of the Promotion Committee attached to the name E by the Chairperson of the Promotion Committee.

B. Around August 20, 2008, the Defendant drafted a letter of undertaking with a view to exercising it within the office of 503 office of the building D, Jung-gu, Seoul, and forged one copy of the letter of undertaking with the seal of the chairman of C Promotion Committee E, who signed the name column without obtaining the approval of the chairman of C Promotion Committee E.

2. On August 20, 2008, the Defendant, within the office located in Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City D Building No. 503, delivered each of the above documents to the Korea Forest Construction Comprehensive architect Office (Before the change, the future architectural office) without knowing that the documents were forged, and exercised the above documents.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness J;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Statement to J police officers;

1. Protocol of examination of the witness of the defendant defendant A;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of contract and undertaking;

1. Article 231 of the Criminal Act, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2)1 of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

arrow