1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On May 4, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on May 20, 2014, when he/she entered and stayed in the Republic of Korea as a tourism visa and visa (B-2, and period of stay 30 days) on May 4, 2014.

On March 4, 2015, the Defendant rendered a disposition not to approve the Plaintiff’s application for refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute “a well-founded fear of persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Refugee Convention and Article 1 of the Refugee Protocol.

The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on March 16, 2015, but the said objection was dismissed on September 24, 2015.

【인정근거】다툼 없는 사실, 갑제1 내지 4호증, 을제1, 2, 4호증의 각 기재 이 사건 처분의 적법 여부 원고의 주장 원고는 예멘 옙(Ibb)주 옙시에서 태어나 그곳에서 거주하였고, 원고와 원고의 가족은 모두 시아파 무슬림이다.

However, the Plaintiff was expelled from a university that was enrolled on the ground of Sympha, and the Plaintiff was assaulted and safinite from human beings in 2012. On November 2013, 2013, the Plaintiff was killed by his/her finites.

In addition, the Narson forced the land of the Plaintiff parent.

Therefore, the defendant's disposition of this case which did not recognize the plaintiff as a refugee is unlawful even though the possibility that the plaintiff would be stuffed due to the above circumstances is high in the case that the plaintiff returned to mentmen.

Judgment

If the above facts are added to the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 3, 5, and 6 and the whole arguments, it is insufficient to view that the plaintiff has a well-founded fear of persecution, taking into account the following circumstances, and the defendant's disposition of this case is lawful since there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

According to the passport records, the plaintiff's punishment is imposed.