Text
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 65,765,115 with respect to the Plaintiff and the period from March 11, 2014 to April 6, 2017.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. 1) The Plaintiff is the party’s position 1) The Plaintiff’s single-story building of the steel frame framed located in Bocheon City C (hereinafter “instant burning building”).
(2) Defendant B leased the instant burning building and the fence, and operated a factory that manufactures the two-way sign of the trade name called “E” in which the instant building and fence are located.
3) Defendant B’s insurance contract with Defendant Dong-dong Fire and Insurance Contract with himself as the insured (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant insurance contract”).
The main contents are as follows. The amount of insurance coverage covered by the separate insurance period (the maximum amount of fire liability of KRW 20 million from December 12, 2013 to December 12, 2014, the fire liability of KRW 20 million from November 10, 2010 to November 10, 2015, the two insurance contracts business partnership insurance of KRW 20 million, the fire liability of KRW 50 million from November 10, 2015.
B. (1) On March 11, 2014, between around 19:00 and around 19:08 on the same day, the fire occurred in the instant fireproof building, and the burning building of this case was destroyed. (2) The government fire fighting unit of this case conducted the fire investigation from the date of the fire fighting to the 19th day of the same month. The main contents of the fire fighting unit are as follows.
▣건물 평면도 ▣ 화재발생 전후 상황 - 이 사건 발화 건물의 사무실 바로 옆(정문 쪽)에는 외국인 근로자가 라면 및 커피 등을 끓여 먹을 수 있도록 2구 가스레인지(LPG 연료)가 설치되어 있었으나 E 대표자는 이를 사용하지 않았다고 주장함 - 당시 근무 중이던 외국인 근로자 2명이 현장에서 다른 곳으로 자리를 옮겨 나타나지 않는 것으로 보아 외국인 근로자의 부주의 측면이 의심되나 증거자료가 없음 - 화재 발견 후 외국인 근로자가 소화기를 가져다 초기 진화를 시도하였으나 화세가 커져 바로...