Text
1. As to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) KRW 3,668,992 against the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and its amount from December 20, 2017 to August 10, 2018.
Reasons
A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.
1. Basic facts
A. On February 15, 2017, the Plaintiff entered into an insurance contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant A with Defendant A as to all of the buildings located in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu (a single-story consisting of a combination of 336 square meters of the total floor area of each building) and machinery, movable property, etc. located in the building (attached Form 1) and the same insurance contract (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).
The defendant B, who is the father of the defendant A, operated the "D" in 5, 6, and 6 from among the above 5, 6, and 7 buildings for which the insurance contract of this case was concluded, and E used part of the building forward of the above 5 building for the preparation of a sofainite.
The above 5th building is located in a single-story building consisting of a prefabricated steel-frame sand position panel in which F is operated to the left, and between the above F building and the above F building and the 5th and the 6th building, each assembly pipe pipe tent has been installed, thereby blocking the ceiling, and Defendant B used them for the purpose of storing various materials in the said tent.
B. On February 19, 2017, a fire occurred in D operated by Defendant B around 20:48.
Due to the instant fire, each tent located between the five and six buildings and the F buildings that D are used due to the instant fire, and other machinery, movable property, etc. in each of the above buildings and the tents were entirely stored, and one wall of the F buildings was burned.
C. As a result of the fire site investigation in the mountain fire station, the fire investigators conducted a field investigation on the instant fire site two times from February 19, 2017 to February 21, 2017.
As a result, according to the surrounding CCTV images, it is presumed that the central passage, which is a part of the tent boundary between the five buildings and 5,6 buildings, was first launched. ① On the date of the occurrence of the fire, there was no working person working on the day of the fire, and D's employees, etc. cut off all of the machinery and equipment at the time of leaving. However, it seems that the fire occurred.