logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.05.31 2017고정700
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Forging and exercising a contract for creation of the right to collateral security;

A. On March 15, 2016, the Defendant, without authority, issued a certified copy of the Defendant’s resident registration that contains B’s personal information and the Defendant’s resident registration, and forged two copies of a mortgage establishment agreement in the name of B by delegation to D by way of entering his/her personal information in the debtor column of a contract for the creation of a right to collateral security (hereinafter “mortgage”) and entrusting D with a seal impression in the agreement for the establishment of a right to collateral security (hereinafter “right to collateral security”) to the head of the affairs of a certified judicial scrivener who is aware of the fact in the coffee shop, which is located in the Orpo-si Eup, Gwangju, about March 15, 2016.

B. On March 15, 2016, the Defendant: (a) requested the foregoing D to receive two copies of the written agreement on the establishment of the right to collateral security to the court of law, and (b) submitted and exercised as if two copies of the written agreement on the establishment of the right to collateral security had been duly formed by the court of law, which was located in the Maternro-ro 7 of the wife population, as the court

In light of the records, criminal facts were appropriately revised to the extent that there is no impediment to the defendant's exercise of the right of defense and basic facts were identical.

2. Forging or holding a mobile phone opening application;

A. On March 17, 2016, without authority, the Defendant, without authority, prepared a written application for opening of the cell phone in B’s name using the identification card and seal impression of B prepared in the front shopping complex G agency of the above apartment complex, and forged one copy of the written application for opening of the cell phone in B’s name by sealing B’s seal impression on the name side;

B. The Defendant immediately submitted the aforementioned mobile phone opening application to a communications agency as if the said mobile phone opening application was duly prepared.

3. Forgery and events of a modified user agreement of a leased vehicle;

A. The Defendant.

arrow