logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.04.15 2015고단2193
사문서위조등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative of D, Defendant B is the chief of affairs of law firm E, and Victim F is the representative of G agricultural partnership and creditor.

1. On March 18, 2014, the Defendants conspired with the Defendants to forge private documents, and drafted a power of attorney with the name of the victim F (55 years, 50 years, 7732 square meters in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City H Law Firm E office, the victim F (5 years, 732 square meters) established this right of f (5 years, 000 square meters).

In addition, in the application form for cancellation registration of mortgage establishment, G farming association representative director F, registration number K for registration, and address, Jinanando J in Jinan-do, Jinan-gun, Jinando, in the column of registration, was prepared.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to exercise their rights and duties, and each of them made an application form for cancellation of registration of mortgage creation and a power of attorney, which are private documents related to rights and duties.

2. On March 25, 2014, the Defendants conspired with the Defendants to exercise the said investigation documents, and each of them filed an application for the cancellation of the forged power of attorney and the registration of the establishment of a right to collateral security with respect to the registered public official who was unable to know the forgery at the Daegu District Court of Ulsan District, Daegu District Court.

3. The Defendants conspired to make false entries in the original copy of a process deed and had a registry official, whose name is not known at the same date and time as paragraph 2, and at a place, enter false facts in the register of land which is the original copy of a notarial deed, by having the public official make a false report to the public on March 18, 2014 on the said real estate, and upon having the registration official cancel the establishment of a right under consideration for the cause of registration.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police officer under B;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to F;

1. Registration of the establishment of a complaint, a certified copy of real estate register, and a collateral security;

arrow