1. The Defendant’s disposition of imposing a surcharge of KRW 5,256,00 against the Plaintiff on April 30, 2014 is revoked.

2. The plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 24, 2013 through January 31, 2014, the Plaintiff started public service in the Daecheon-si waterworks department, and served in the Control and Prevention Department of Construction and Transportation in Chungcheongnam-do. From February 1, 2014, the Plaintiff is a local public official working in the B Management Office until the date of February 1, 2014.

B. The Defendant: (a) released the Plaintiff’s business trip site without permission twice; (b) received entertainment equivalent to a total of KRW 1,752,00 from a business-related company, etc.; (c) notified the Plaintiff of the standards for the conduct related to the golf of public officials of Chungcheongnam-do; (d) Articles 48, 53, and 5 of the Local Public Officials Act; and (e) Articles 14 and 14-2 of the Code of Conduct for Public Officials of Chungcheongnam-do (Amended by Presidential Decree No. 3233, Dec. 30, 2014); and (e) Articles 3 and 7 of the Guidelines on the Standards for the Conduct related to the Golf of Public Officials of Chungcheongnam-do; and (e) Articles 48, 53, and 55 of the Local Public Officials Service Act (Amended by Ordinance No. 390, Apr. 30, 2014); and (e) Articles 84, 205 and 51 of the Local Public Officials Service Act (Amended by Ordinance No.

C. Accordingly, on May 30, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a petition review on the imposition of two months of the above suspension from office and surcharges for disciplinary action. On July 30, 2014, the Cheongnam-do Local Appeals Review Committee partially accepted the Plaintiff’s assertion on July 30, 2014, and mitigated the two months of the suspension from office as one month of suspension from office.

(2) The disposition of suspension from office as revised for one month of suspension from office is deemed to be a disposition of suspension from office, the disposition of suspension from office, and the disposition of imposition of the above disciplinary surcharge, and each of the above dispositions is deemed to be “each of the above dispositions of this case” (hereinafter “each of the above dispositions of this case”).

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is as follows, and each disposition of this case must be revoked as follows.

1. Preparation of an Inspector General of the Safety and Administration who is the basis for each of the dispositions in this case.