beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s disposition of imposing surcharge of KRW 1,332,00 against the Plaintiff on February 12, 2015 is revoked.
2. The plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On June 1989, the Plaintiff started public service at the National Health Center of Yanan-si, Incheon-si, and worked in the Incheon-si cleaning administration division from September 14, 2005 to June 22, 2008, and from July 2013 to July 2013, the Plaintiff is a local public official working in the National Resources Policy Division of Yan-si.
B. On October 31, 2014, the Daejeon District Prosecutors’ Office: (a) on the Plaintiff, “Around May 2009, the representative of B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”) which the Plaintiff is entrusted with food and resource-making facilities and recycling line facilities from the astronomical City, appears to have his employees be the 12-day clerical error of 13 days in total on 4 occasions. In the meantime, the Plaintiff received a bribe of approximately 4 million in relation to his duties by receiving the cost of purchasing human resources and miscellaneous materials accompanied by the inside repair of the Plaintiff’s house, and received a bribe of KRW 4 million in relation to his duties.”
C. From May to May 2011, to May 2013, the Defendant confirmed that the Plaintiff received a bribe equivalent to approximately KRW 666,000 from five employees of B, a business entity related to his/her duties, on a total of three occasions as shown in the attached Table, and received a bribe of approximately KRW 66,00 (hereinafter referred to as “the instant misconduct”), through his/her own investigation, the part of the house repair services (replacement and replacement of the roof) services, “the first misconduct,” “the second misconduct,” “the house repair services (replacement and repair of the B B),” “the third misconduct,” “the third misconduct,” and “the instant misconduct,” “the duty of Article 48 (Duty of Notification and Removal of B and Construction of B,” Article 20 (Duty of Notice and Disposition No. 10 (1)3, Article 50 (1) and (2), Article 50 (1) (3) of the Local Public Officials Act, and Article 50 (1) (3) of the Act, Article 20 (1) of the Act.
The above suspension disposition is "the suspension of office of this case" and "the imposition of disciplinary surcharge of this case".