logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.03.17 2014고단7742
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle by borrowing C.

1. While the Defendant was under the suspension of the validity of a vehicle’s driver’s license from August 13, 2014 to October 31, 2014, the Defendant proceeded with a section of approximately 500 meters from the Do in front of the backline in Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, by driving the said vehicle on September 21, 2014, while under the influence of 0.195% alcohol level during blood without obtaining the driver’s license.

2. Around September 21, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (i.e., an escapeing vehicle) and the Road Traffic Act (i.e., an accident) (ii., an accident) led to a speed of about 40 km per hour depending on one lane between the three lanes in the direction of the backline and the two lanes in the direction of the backline.

At the time, the above place is night and the vehicle traffic is frequent, so there was a duty of care to prevent traffic accidents by properly operating the steering gear and operating the steering system as well as operating the steering system, keeping the front and rear left well, and driving the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as described in Paragraph 1, was under the suspension of driver’s license, but was under the influence of alcohol due to occupational negligence and negligence by the Defendant’s failure to give proper attention to the direction of the driving while driving in the front of the vehicle, and was under the back part of the G observer’s car driven by the Defendant, which was under the influence of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, committed an injury to light salt, etc., which requires the victim’s treatment for approximately two weeks, and escaped without immediately stopping and taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the injured party, even though the lower pande of the observer car was damaged.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's person;

arrow