The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal begins first, and the defendant started a bath and assault due to the assault by A, and the defendant was merely boomed in the process of taking A's hand and requesting tax calculation and calculation of tax base in a situation where he was unable to bleep his eye and hair collection due to the assault by A. Thus, the defendant's act constitutes self-defense.

Even if it does not constitute self-defense, the court below's punishment (2 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하면, 피고인과 A이 서로 밀친 사실, 이후 A으로부터 피고인이 눈을 맞은 후에는 피고인이 발길질을 하기도 한 사실, A에게 머리카락을 붙잡히고는 피고인이 이를 뿌리치기 위해 A의 손을 꼬집고 할퀸 사실이 인정된다.

설령 피고인이 A으로부터 훨씬 더 많이 맞았다고 하여도 그에 대항하여 발길질을 하고, A의 손을 꼬집고 할퀸 피고인의 행위는 A의 부당한 공격을 방위한 것이라기보다는 서로 공격할 의사로 싸우다가 먼저 공격을 받고 이에 대항하여 가해하게 된 것이라고 봄이 상당하다.

In such a case of fighting, the harmful act is at the same time an act of defense, and thus, it does not constitute self-defense.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2000Do228 delivered on March 28, 2000, etc.). Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion of self-defense is without merit.

Furthermore, in full view of the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, the circumstance leading up to the instant crime, the degree of exercise of tangible power, and the result of injury, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

Although the defendant asserts that the conditions agreed by both parties are unfair because they are not reflected in the sentencing of the court below, in light of the contents of the written agreement (No. 49,56 of the trial record) submitted to the court below, the defendant's injury to A and injury caused by negligence against D shall be considered respectively.