Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

Around 17:00 on 17:00 on 17:0 on 17:0 on 2014, the Defendant was assaulted in the course of a dispute with the victim C and the Defendant on the street in front of the 104 farm road, which is located in the same spoke-dong, for the reason that he was fluoring the victim C and the Defendant, and was able to gather soil in the surrounding areas, and fluored up the victim’s head, fluored by both hand, and fluoredly, fluoredly fluoredly fluored the victim by gathering the fluor in the surrounding area.

Accordingly, the victim suffered injury on the two sides and both sides of the two weeks of treatment, the right side side side side side, the scarcity, the left side hand, and the right side.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Photographs photographs of the damaged part of the C Assault;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the written diagnosis of injury to C;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of a fine concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant asserts to the effect that the Defendant’s assault on the assertion of self-defense by the Defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act constitutes self-defense as a passive resistance to defend the victim’s wrongful attack.

이 사건의 발생 경위와 진행 과정, 목적, 수단, 폭행의 정도(나무토막으로 가슴과 안면부를 할퀸 점) 등 제반 사정에 비추어 보면, 이 사건은 피고인과 피해자 상호간의 싸움으로 보이고 피고인의 행위는 피해자의 부당한 공격을 방어하기 위한 소극적 저항행위에 불과한 것이 아니라 공격행위인 동시에 방어행위라 할 것이므로 정당방위에 해당하지 않는다.

Defendant

The defense of counsel is not accepted.