1. The Defendants are as shown in the separate sheet No. 1 among each real estate listed in the separate sheet to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Appointor.

1. In December 2009, the Plaintiff (the appointed party, hereinafter “Plaintiff”), the designated party (excluding the appointed party E), the Defendants, and F, who are co-owners of each real estate listed in the separate sheet for determination as to the cause of the claim (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”), may be recognized if there is no dispute between the parties, or if there is no objection to the use of the road as to each of the instant real estate, such as the indication of the separate sheet No. 2, with respect to the use of the land, the consent of the use of the land was made. The latter fact that F transferred the entire share of each of the instant real estate to E, and the fact that the road as indicated in the separate sheet No. 1,323 square meters in total as indicated in the separate sheet No. 1,323 square meters of the site for each of the instant real estate (hereinafter “the instant real estate”).

According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendants are obligated to grant permission for development activities and to express their consent to use for the purpose of applying for a building permit with respect to the total area of 1,323 square meters of the site for each real estate of this case, which is the J, K, L, M, and M, indicated in the above written consent.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.