logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.06.22 2017고단1379
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2017 Highest 1379" was using a credit card issued by Dong-in C, with the personal information of C, who used the credit card issued by Dong-in C, to use it.

1. Forging a private document or uttering of a falsified investigation document;

A. On September 22, 2014, the Defendant committed a crime on September 22, 2014, without authority, filed an application for credit card purchase under the name of C, a private document signed by C on his/her name and affixed his/her own signature to the applicant column, with the intent to exercise the trade name in the office where it is impossible to identify the trade name located in the north-dong, Masan-dong, Busan-si, and submitted the application for credit card purchase under the name of C, which is a private document on rights and obligations, to an employee of the credit card company without authority. At that time, the Defendant submitted the application for forgery to the employees of the credit card company under the name that knew of the forgery.

B. On November 19, 2014, the Defendant, without authority, submitted to the applicant column, “D” in the resident number column, “F loan 301” in the applicant column, “C” in the applicant column with the signature of “C” and “C” in the applicant column with the intent to exercise the trade name in the office where it is impossible to identify the trade name in the northwest-dong, Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si. At that time, the Defendant forged one copy of the application for the subscription of a credit card in the name of “C”, which is a private document related to rights and duties by signing in the name side of the applicant column, and submitted the forged application to the employees of the card company under the name-free name that was unaware of the forgery.

2. Fraud;

A. On September 22, 2014, the Defendant did not have the legitimate right to use a credit card in the name of C issued as described in paragraph (1) of Article 1, as of September 22, 2014, the Defendant, on October 21, 2014, provided goods equivalent to KRW 16,230 from the victim limited liability company employees and presented as if he/she had the legitimate right to use the credit card, and paid the price from October 21, 2014 to November 6, 2016.

arrow