beta
Text
1. The Korean Federation of Passenger Transport Business Association and Defendant D are jointly and severally liable to Plaintiff A and Plaintiff B.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On December 11, 2014, the networkF (hereinafter referred to as “the network”) driven G1110 MTM, and returned to the left in accordance with the first lane of the third parallel road, in violation of the signal from the front intersection to the front intersection road located in Busan-dong, Busan-gu, to the front intersection road in writing, from the front intersection road to the front intersection road, the network F (hereinafter referred to as “the network”) turned to the front intersection road from the front intersection; (a) Defendant C’s H (H), Jinasi, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “one vehicle in the East Sea”), who was directly moving to the front intersection under the new name, was driven to the front intersection road from the front intersection intersection; (b) approximately 24 seconds after Defendant D’s speeded to approximately 87 km/hh of the speed, and (c) Defendant D re-driving to the front intersection and the second intersection of the two two-way vehicle in accordance with the shock and the third-party EM (hereinafter referred to as “AMMM”).
(hereinafter “instant traffic accident”).
B. The Deceased died at the site of the instant traffic accident. The Deceased’s heir is the Plaintiff A and B, who is her mother, and the Plaintiff B, who is her mother, and the Defendant National Passenger Transport Business Association (hereinafter “Defendant Federation”) is the mutual aid business entity for the two vehicles of the next year.
C. On February 17, 2016, Defendant D had been negligent in engaging in the instant traffic accident by negligence on the ground that: (a) the instant traffic accident caused the instant traffic accident by negligence on the ground that: (b) the speed limit on February 17, 2016 is the intersection where the crosswalk is installed at a speed of 60km per hour; (c) the Deceased was in excess of the crosswalk; and (d) the Deceased caused the instant traffic accident by negligence; and (d) Defendant E was at the time of the instant traffic accident.
Inasmuch as it is difficult to readily conclude that the instant traffic accident occurred or that it was known, each of the judgment of innocence was rendered (Dasan District Court 2015Kadan1156), and the public prosecutor and Defendant D appealed, but the judgment dismissing the instant traffic accident on June 3, 2016.