1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff for 7,00,000 won and each year from April 3, 2011 to June 24, 2014.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

(a)The following facts of recognition are not disputed between the Parties, or may be admitted by taking into account the overall purport of the pleadings as a whole in the entries in Gap evidence 1 to 3 and 7 (including paper numbers):

1) The Plaintiff is the driver of Cma business car, and Defendant B is the driver of the D business taxi, and the Federation of the Korea Passenger Transport Business Association is the mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to the above business taxi. (2) Defendant B driven the above business taxi on April 3, 201, around 23:20, while driving the two-lanes of the two-lane road in front of the excellent exclusion pumps in the Exclusion Exclusion Exclusion Track-dong in the above business taxi and driving the two-lanes of the two-lane road in the front of the Exclusion Exclusion Trap-dong at the open intersection at the parallel of the open intersection, with the yellow color extinction signal installed in the front bank at the speed of the front, without reducing the speed, and due to negligence such as neglecting the front line at the speed and neglecting the front line of the above business taxi, it caused the Plaintiff’s operation seat part of the above EM car that entered the above intersection and went through the above business vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

3) The Plaintiff’s injury to brain-dead, light fluoral salt, fluoral salt, dluoral typhy, etc. (hereinafter “instant injury”) that requires approximately three weeks’ medical treatment due to the instant accident.

He entered the Republic of Korea from April 3, 201 to April 23, 2011, and received medical treatment from the Common Red Cross Hospital.

B. According to the above facts of recognition as the ground for liability for damages, since Defendant B caused the instant accident by negligence and sustained injury to the Plaintiff, Defendant B is a tort, and Defendant B is jointly and severally liable to compensate for the damages suffered by the Plaintiff as a mutual aid business operator.

C. Restrictions on liability for damages: (a) the Plaintiff was negligent in exercising its duty of care, such as making a slowly prior to entering the said intersection; and (b) the Plaintiff’s error is deemed as such.