1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the defendant against the plaintiff D, E, and F in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiffs are the owners of each vehicle at the time of the instant accident as indicated below (hereinafter “the instant accident”). The Defendant is the insurer who concluded the automobile insurance contract for the instant vehicle due to the occurrence of the instant accident.

On July 4, 2017, the details of the first time of the accident on the date of the Plaintiff’s initial registration of the vehicle, 1 AI Laston No. 1 AI on July 5, 2010, and the side and back portion of the Plaintiff’s vehicle in normal driving, C (9%) JMW on November 27, 2015, JW 3D (9%) 3D (9%) on December 14, 2018, E (1%) K 1%) on December 29, 2017, the vehicle affected the Plaintiff’s vehicle by a sudden stop on the expressway of December 4, 2018, and the vehicle affected the Plaintiff’s shock by the shock on August 27, 2017.

B. The Plaintiffs’ vehicles were destroyed by the instant accident, and the odometer, repair details, etc. at the time of the accident are as listed below.

In the event of the Plaintiff’s accident, the main framework size and details of the standard repair cost at the time of the accident: A 126,479km 10,700,000 won and the main framework size of KRW 4,810,000: The fish panel, etc.: 2 B (1%), C (99%) 34,760,000 won 19,490,000 won and the main external board size: 3D (99%), E1%) 58,37 km, 120,000 won, 10,000 won and the main external board size: 30,000 won or less, 30,000 won or less, 19,40,000 won or less, and 3:30,000,000 won or more of the total appraisal panel, etc., 40,050,000 won or more of the other major appraisal panel, etc.

2. Determination

A. Articles due to the tort of the relevant legal doctrine.