logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.12.02 2015고단4331
상표법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, each of the above punishments shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, while purchasing goods on behalf of Chinese merchants who have purchased goods in Korea, A was trying to manufacture a fake package similar to the “N.M.F. Accusing Maspact” of L&S P&C Co., Ltd. to sell it to Chinese merchants. On November 2014, A requested Defendant C to manufacture 500,000 won of the said fake package package, and Defendant C requested Defendant B, who operated “L” in L, to manufacture the said fake package.

Defendant

A transferred KRW 10 million to the bank account in the name of Defendant C (Account Number M) around November 14, 2014, and KRW 15 million around February 2, 2015, with the funds for manufacturing the aforementioned fake, and KRW 15 million to the national bank account in the name of Defendant C (Account NumberO) around February 2, 2015, and KRW 5 million to the national bank account in the name of Defendant C, around February 10, 2015, and KRW 50 million around February 10, 2015, and KRW 38 million around February 12, 2015 to the police officer from January 14, 2015 to February 2, 2015, and KRW 500,000 to the above defendant Da 50,000,000 won to the above defendant Da.

Defendant

C with such funds as above, purchased materials such as fryes on which a fake trademark was printed, and manufactured and supplied machinery which injects a license to fry, to Defendant B.

Defendant

B around December 31, 2014, from March 20, 2015 to March 20, 2015, “L” manufactured approximately 814,500 N.M.F Cccccccing clin clin clin clin clin clin clin clin clin clin clin clin clin clin clin clin clin clin clin clin clin clin clin clit clin clin clin clin cl

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to use the trademark similar to the registered trademark of the victim, which is the designated goods of cremation, thereby infringing the trademark rights of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow