logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.11.30 2018고단2370
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 00:30 on September 6, 2018, the Defendant, who interfered with his/her duties, hited his/her nose into the “D marina” managed by the victim C (53 aged) of the victim C (53) and changed his/her plastic paper, and the victim demanded the value of his/her salary, and the victim demanded the value of his/her salary, she is “Chewing, dead, discarded, and leaked;

The aging and aging made a brupt, such as the bruging of the brus, the death of the brus, and the escape of the brus, and the brut business of the victimized person by force, such as intending to brug the victim by drinking.

2. 공무집행 방해 피고인은 2018. 9. 6. 00:40 경부터 같은 날 01:10 경까지 제 1 항 기재 마트에서 112 신고를 받고 출동한 하 남 경찰서 소속 경찰 관인 경장 E 및 같은 소속 경장 F으로 부터 마트 밖으로 나가 귀가할 것을 요구 받자 위 경찰관들에게 " 짭새 새끼야, 힘도 좆도 없는 늙은 새끼가 지랄을 한다.

"A Do et al.," and assaulted by brushing and pushing ahead of the two descendants of the above E.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention of crimes by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of CCTV-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act reflects the defendant's wrongness, the defendant agreed with the victim C, and the defendant has no criminal history exceeding the fine, etc., as indicated in the records, shall be determined by taking into account all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records.

arrow