The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the judgment below which acquitted the defendant on the ground that there is a possibility that the defendant could not recognize the accident, and that there is a possibility that the defendant could not recognize the accident, even though he did not recognize the accident, because he did not recognize the accident, in part of the trial expenses due to the change of course between the victim D and the vehicle due to the change of course to the left side of the victim's vehicle, the degree of damage was shocked, and the degree of damage was not provided to the victim's vehicle.

2. The lower court determined on April 4, 2012, around 13:30, the Defendant driven the freight vehicle on the street in front of the Seo-dong, Seo-dong, Incheon, Seo-dong 602-24, Cheongdo-dong, Incheon, and used to transmit at four lanes in the middle of five lanes from the front of the Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, Cheongdo-dong. The victim also was waiting at the right side to drive the freight and directly drive the freight in the same direction. After that, the Defendant was waiting for the victim vehicle. In that process, the Defendant was driving the vehicle on the right side of the victim vehicle, and the front part of the driver’s board was parked, and the vehicle was broken, even though the victim’s door, even and some parts were found, it was sufficient to recognize that there was no possibility of harm to the victim’s vehicle due to any other accident, and the Defendant did not know that there was no possibility of harm to the victim’s vehicle due to any other accident. In full view of the facts charged, the Defendant did not know that there was any other accident and vibration.