logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원부천지원 2019.08.30 2018가단13938
채무부존재확인
Text

1. There is no obligation of the Plaintiff to pay damages to the Defendant regarding the traffic accident stated in the attached Table 1.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On August 20, 2018, the Plaintiff driven a vehicle E (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) on August 18:04, and tried to change the course to a single-lane course within the intersection while the G apartment distance, which is an intersection where a shooting signal, etc. is installed in the vicinity of the Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, was sent from the distribution street range to the location of the street.

However, the Defendant driven a H vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) in one lane (on the left side of the Plaintiff’s left side) and entered the intersection by straighten signaling the above straighten signal, and the collision between the part front of the Defendant’s right side and the part following the Plaintiff’s left side of the vehicle was occurred (hereinafter “instant accident”).

B. The Plaintiff’s Intervenor is an insurance company that entered into a comprehensive insurance contract with the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 4, 7 evidence, Eul evidence 1 to 3 (including each number, if any) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff asserted 1) The plaintiff asserts that "a person's own letter complies with road signs and signals, while the defendant's access to the right-hand signal to the intersection was in violation of the direction indicating traffic safety facilities under the Road Traffic Act, so the accident of this case occurred by the defendant's unilateral negligence, and therefore the plaintiff is not liable to compensate for the damage of the defendant." On the other hand, the defendant argues that the accident of this case occurred due to the plaintiff's violation of prohibition of change of course and the violation of prohibition of overtaking, and therefore, the defendant suffered damage to the defendant's vehicle.

arrow