The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B rocketing taxi.

On May 24, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 11:00, and proceeded along the four-lane road in front of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul, along the direction of the parallel of sex water at the upstream of pressure-gu.

Since there was an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by reducing speed to a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle, keeping the front door well, and driving safely in accordance with the traffic signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and thereby driven by the victim D (V, 70 years old) who was proceeding under the new subparagraph on the right side of the running direction of the motor vehicle on the right side by negligence in violation of the signal.

EMW car even right door was received as the front part of the above vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above.

2. The instant case is premised on the fact that the Defendant was going to proceed directly rather than going to make a right-hand at the instant intersection.

However, the following circumstances that can be recognized by evidence, i.e., the widths in the direct direction of the defendant taxi, and thus the defendant taxi left the left-hand side of the vehicle in order for the defendant taxi to go through the intersection of this case.

야 하는 점, 그런데 블랙 박스 동영상에는 피고인 택시의 진행방향이 이 사건 직전에 피고인의 주장과 같이 우측방향으로 이동되기 시작한 점{ 검사 직무 대리 작성의 수사보고( 동 영상 내용 확인 등 )에는 피고인 차량의 앞 부분이 우측방향으로 꺽어 진행되어야 했으나 접촉사고가 발생하기까지 우회전하려는 징후를 전혀 확인할 수 없었다고...