A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] The defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for not less than ten months on February 14, 2017 by the Seoul High Court for interference with business affairs, etc.

4.2. A person who has been convicted of 26 times of violence, including the completion of the enforcement of the sentence in the Seoul detention center.

[Criminal facts]

1. On December 2, 2017, the Defendant committed violence: (a) around 16:35, the front side of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, and (b) on the front side of the victim D (80) for the reason that Dogin C was under the influence of alcohol and was under the influence of alcohol, and (c) during the course of assaulting C, the Defendant was softened by the victim on the ground that he resisted the victim with respect to the front side of the victim’s vehicle.

"At the same time, the body of the victim was sealed by both hands, and the victim's right side with the hand floor was at one time."

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

2. The Defendant, at around 17:00 on December 2, 2017, at the place specified in the preceding paragraph, and at around 112 reported on the act of violence, such as the preceding paragraph, was sent to the site, the Defendant, a police officer affiliated with the Seoul East-gu Police Station Edistrict, Seoul East-gu, Seoul, would put the police officer into a bit of bitch, bitch,” and the Defendant’s bitle of bitch, “this son, bitle, bitle, bitch, bitch, bitch bitch, bitch bitch bitch, bitch bitch bitch.”

“Along with the desire of the foregoing police officer, the said police officer took the bath of “A” and the said police officer took the bath of “A Mae Mae Mae Ma,” and the said police officer was tightly pushed the chest of the said police officer with his hand, and was on one occasion on the part of the said police officer.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties of police officers regarding the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Each statement of D and G;

1. A damaged vehicle photograph;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of an inquiry letter, such as criminal history, and an investigation report (report on confirmation of the status of a suspect A repeated offense) statute;

1. Article 260 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 260 of the Criminal Act (the point of violence).