logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 05. 26. 선고 2016두34134 판결
(심리불속행)[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2015Nu45085 (2016.014)

Title

(Resceptic Conduct)

Summary

The issue of this case’s capital increase cannot be deemed as falling under “a case where stocks are allocated by means of public offering of securities subject to no gift tax,” and the issue of this case’s capital increase or merger related to the assessment of listed stocks

The records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds prescribed in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of

Related statutes

Article 39 (Donation of Benefits from Capital Increase) of the Inheritance Tax and Gift Tax Act, Article 2 (Definitions) and Article 8 (Report of Public Offering or Sale) of the Securities and Exchange Act Article 2-4 (Public Offering or Sale of Securities) of the Enforcement Decree of the Securities and Exchange Act

arrow