1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On April 6, 2012, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea with a short-term visit visa (C-3 and 90 days of stay) on April 6, 2012, and filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on June 18, 2012.

On January 24, 2014, the Defendant rejected the Plaintiff’s recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff could not be deemed to have “probed well-founded grounds for gambling” (see Article 2 of the Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 11298, Feb. 10, 2012); Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees; Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees” (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on February 25, 2014, but was dismissed on September 26, 2014.

[Based on recognition, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings of the instant disposition is legitimate, the plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff is legitimate in the disposition of this case is a hunjb, a hyke-syke-sab born in the area of Punb, and a hyke-syakb, etc., an organization of Syke village in 196. On Jan. 27, 2012, the chairperson of the instant organization, who is the chairperson of the said organization, took part in the religious seminars advance meeting, performed the management and operation of donations after joining B, and performed a threat of violence, such as taking advantage of the fact that D (D) as an ordinary member of Sipah-e-Sab (Sipabb) collected himself/herself, together with other members of the instant organization.

) On the following day, the Plaintiff and two other persons were threatened by telephone. Although there was a well-founded fear that the Plaintiff still was threatened by D to the safety of life and body, and thus, the Defendant did not recognize the Plaintiff as a refugee, the instant disposition was unlawful. The same is as indicated in the separate sheet in the relevant statutes. No. 3 through 7 (including the number of pages) are included.