logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2014.10.23 2014구합8278
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 13, 2003, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Pakistan as a foreigner of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter “Pakic Republic”), and continued to extend the period of stay on May 13, 2003, and filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on April 26, 2013, the day immediately preceding the expiration of the period of stay.

B. The Defendant, on May 20, 2013, promulgated with sufficient grounds for gambling [the Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 11298, Feb. 10, 2012; hereinafter the same shall apply] to the Plaintiff.

) On the ground that Article 2 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees cannot be deemed to exist (hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”) was made for non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”).

C. The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on July 1, 2013, but the said objection was dismissed on April 11, 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 (including branch numbers, if any) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is the case belonging to the Suwon Punjcquerels, as the Rabbb Punj, from the Raj.

In the village where the plaintiff was residing, there are members who jointly use hydrosquerelbababababababa and hydrosulababababababababababababa. As to the election of Mascabam (director), the Masca was brought to a lawsuit due to the dispute over the above p

On the other hand, the Plaintiff assisted 10,000,000 won in total as litigation costs over eight times in the said litigation process.

The plaintiff is staying in the Republic of Korea and has been placed in Pakistan on two occasions, and around January 2013 and February 2013, 2013, the Si-Sari Sipah-e-Sababababa.

arrow