Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant A is a Korean national, and Defendant B is a person who married with Defendant A by falsity and entered the Republic of Korea upon obtaining a visa for visit with Defendant A.

The Defendants agreed to make a disguised marriage for the purpose of having Defendant B enter Korea for the purpose of raising money, and prepared the documents of marriage necessary for international marriage.

At around 11:46 on June 16, 2009, the Defendants conspired to enter false facts in the Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government public service center of the Seongbuk-gu Office of 168, and even though there is no fact of marriage, the facts were prepared, signed and sealed as “A, B” in the column of the parties to the marriage report kept in the public service center of the Gu office, and the parents column shall enter the personal information of “D, E, F, G” in the witness column and make a true marriage report as if they were to enter the true marriage. The Defendants submitted to the public official in charge of the family register affairs, who may know of such facts as the Defendant B’s marriage report necessary for international marriage, such as the false marriage report, and submitted the above public official to enter false facts in the family register information processing system of the public electronic records, and exercised it by allowing the public official in charge to keep it at a place around that time.

2. The defendants and their defense counsel asserted that the defendants and their defense counsel reported their marriage with the intent to create a marital relationship with the truth, so all of the facts charged against the defendants should be acquitted.

3. The burden of proof for the criminal facts prosecuted in a criminal trial for judgment is to be borne by a public prosecutor, and the conviction is to be based on the evidence of probative value that makes a judge feel true beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, if there is no such evidence, the suspicion of guilt is between the defendant, even if there is no such evidence.

(b)if any;