logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.01.22 2014가단46631
부당이득금반환 등
Text

1. The Plaintiff; Defendant B shall be KRW 11,97,920; Defendant C shall be KRW 14,969,909; Defendant E shall be KRW 6,000; and each of the above money.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On July 1, 2014, the Plaintiff responded that, “The number 070 of the name of the party was opened, but the telephone number was 070,000 won in arrears with the above 070 number,” and that there was no fact that the number was opened to 070,000 won,” and the Nonparty provided that he would connect the investigation unit. After that, the nameless person who referred to as the “the nameless person” belongs to the investigation unit to the Plaintiff, “The Plaintiff made a request for contact after creating an OTP for safety because the bank account in the name of the Plaintiff was used as a large passbook and leaked with the security card was leaked.”

As a result, the Plaintiff made an OTP to the Agricultural Cooperative, and the person who was infinite name infinites contact to the above investigator was “the finites arrested the NA staff who leaked the information of the party, and arrested the NA staff who was necessary for the remaining two persons, and notified the OTP number of the party,” and the Plaintiff transferred the money from the Plaintiff’s agricultural bank account to the account in the name of the Defendants from the NA to the account in the name of the defendants, and some of the money was refunded.

On July 1, 2014, G 30,000,000,000 5,200 2 C 2 C on July 1, 2014, Korea Investment Securities G 30,000,000,000,1813D 3D 26,000,000,000 11,000,0000,000 11,000,000,000 11,0665,381 [based on recognition] of the recipient’s transfer date, there is no dispute; the purport of the entire order to submit financial transaction information on the one hand securities of this court; and the purport of the entire pleadings;

2. Determination on the claim for restitution of unjust enrichment

A. Defendant B, without any legal ground due to the deception of the above influences on the ground of the claim, deposited the amount of KRW 29,94,800 (30,000,000-5,200) from the Plaintiff, Defendant C deposited the amount of KRW 29,939,819 (30,000-60,181), and Defendant D deposited the amount of KRW 15,000 (26,000,000-11,000,000) in its own account and deposited the amount of KRW 15,000.

arrow