beta
Text
1. Each appeal filed by the plaintiff and the defendant is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The plaintiff and the defendant are both court officials, and the plaintiff currently has served in the field of Gwangju District Court, and the defendant has served in the Geumsan-gun Court of Daejeon District Court.
B. On November 6, 2012, at around 15:13, the Plaintiff published the same writing as shown in attached Table 1, on the bulletin board of the Judicial Reform Research Council, one of the communities of the Kotnet, a computer network within a court. On the other hand, the Defendant and the Plaintiff sent comments as shown in attached Table 2.
C. From November 7, 2012 to January 25, 2013, the Defendant posted comments on the same contents as is written in attached Table 3 on the above conet’s free bulletin board.
On November 8, 2012, the Plaintiff posted the comments to the National Human Rights Commission of Korea on the part posted by the Defendant in relation to the comments made by the Defendant in the comments made in the above Paragraph B, and on November 8, 2012, on the Plaintiff’s wife “C.”, “I will see the Plaintiff’s wife,” “I will see the Plaintiff’s wife,” and “I will see the appraisal as a sexual harassment against C,” and the Plaintiff made a petition to the effect that I would like to correct it as a sexual harassment against C. On November 8, 2012, the Defendant did not written the same comments as the Plaintiff’s assertion, and the materials submitted by the Plaintiff was not the original, but all of the comments presented by the National Human Rights Commission of Korea. However, on May 22, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant recognized the fact that the Defendant posted the said comments on May 22, 2014.
The debate expressed the body of the victim in bad faith by gathering the victim C, who is not a direct party, evaluating the appearance of a female victim, or smelling in the body “,” and neglecting the disclosure verification, etc. The content of these comments were disclosed through the internal computer network accessible to all the court officials, and Article 2 subparag. 3 of the National Human Rights Commission Act.