1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from February 22, 2013 to October 15, 2014.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff and the defendant are both court officials, and the plaintiff currently has served in the field of Gwangju District Court, and the defendant has served in the Geumsan-gun Court of Daejeon District Court.

B. On November 6, 2012, at around 15:13, the Plaintiff published a letter as shown in the attached Table 1 in the title “Wook” on the website of the Judicial Reform Research Council, one of the community of the Conet, a computer network inside the court, and then published a letter as shown in the attached Table 2.

C. Thereafter, between November 7, 2012 and January 25, 2013, the Defendant posted comments on the same contents as those indicated in attached Table 3 on the bulletin board of the said net website, and on January 30, 2013, the Defendant also prepared and inserted the same contents as indicated in attached Table 4.

The plaintiff was above B.

As to the part of the comments written in the paragraph posted by the defendant, the defendant puts his comments to the National Human Rights Commission of Korea on November 8, 2012, and Da, the plaintiff's wife, "........." and smelled in the womb.

“In the event of detention,” an appraiser shall be deemed to be a reporter.

The Defendant, on November 8, 2012, argued that “I am sexual harassment against C,” and that “I am a petition to the effect that I am a correction. I do not written the same writing as the Plaintiff’s assertion on the website of the Conet Judicial Reform Research Council, and all materials submitted by the Plaintiff were dried.” However, on May 22, 2014, the National Human Rights Commission acknowledged that the Defendant posted the above comments on May 22, 2014, “I am aware of the fact that I am the Defendant posted the above comments,” and said, I am a debate through comments with the Plaintiff.

The debate expressed the victim's body maliciously by gathering the victim C, not the direct party, and evaluating the appearance of the female victim, or snicking the snick in the body of the body of the victim, snicking the snick in the body of the body of the victim, and snicking the disclosure verification, and the content of these comments are accessible to all the court public officials.