logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2020.05.13 2020고단630
마약류관리에관한법률위반(대마)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 8 months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 5 million won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 4 million won.

Defendant

B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants, together with D, are engaged in the activities of the Round Group in the name of D.

1. The Defendants’ co-principal

A. At around March 2018, the Defendants smoked marijuana in the Cambodia Frost on March 1, 2018, after attaching the frosium in the paper to the frost of marijuana, in the following order: (a) the Defendants frosted the hemp in a way that the frosts are cut off several times.

B. The Defendants, at around 21:00 on January 12, 2020, smoked marijuana in a liquor where they knew of the trade name in Thailand cock, and received from foreigners in the name-free circumstances the volume of the hemp’s influencies attached to the paper, and thereafter smoked by a method of drinking at several times.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to smoke marijuana over two occasions.

2. At around 00:00 on January 13, 2020, Defendant A and Defendant B 2 smoked marijuana in the Gmes in Thailand, with D attached a scam on the paper, and then smoked in a way that they cut off several occasions.

Accordingly, the Defendants, in collusion with D, smoked marijuana.

3. Defendant A’s crime;

A. The Defendant violated the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (mariju) on January 15, 2020, posted the marith in the clothes shop where it is difficult to see the trade name in Thailand, and smoked in a way that they drinks the marith of marijuana on paper, with the marith of it.

B. At around 11:40 on January 17, 2020, the Defendant damaged public documents, at the Busan District Prosecutors’ Office 932 Office located in 15, the Busan District Court located in 15, the Busan District Prosecutors’ Office, in relation to the crime of violation of the Narcotics Control Act (mariana), and sought explanation about the procedure for the extraction from the narcotics investigation officer H in relation to the crime of violation of the Narcotics Control Act (mariana), and the Defendant voluntarily signed and sealed the collection consent, which is a public document, and submitted it to the above narcotics investigation officer, the Defendant saw one copy of the written consent for the extraction of the collection on his own books, and Chewing part

Accordingly, the defendant uses documents in public offices.

arrow