logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.03.19 2014고정63
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 6, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for ten months in the Daegu District Court for fraud, etc. and the said judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

In order to raise the performance of sales of mobile phone, the Defendant posted an advertisement “a small amount of loans if opened a mobile phone,” which is a land for living information, etc., and borrowed money to the persons who start the advertisement and received delegations and certificates of personal seal impression, etc., the Defendant used it to open the mobile phone in the name of the said debtor, thereby raising the performance of sales of mobile phone in the name of the said debtor, and if the debtor fails to repay his/her loan, he/she used it to dispose of the mobile phone in the name of the debtor as the so-called “largephone.”

Therefore, around September 9, 2008, the Defendant borrowed 100,000 won from D and received delegations and certificates of personal seal impression from D to “C” located in the Daegu Northern-gu B, Daegu Northern-gu, and then, from December 22, 2008 through December 26, 2008 to December 26, 2008, the Defendant issued the delegations and certificates of personal seal impression in the above name of D and issued the victim SK Telecom and Co., Ltd., Ltd., and by deceiving the employees in charge of LG telecom, Inc., Ltd., and LG telecom, respectively, from 3 mobile phones to 3 mobile phones, from 3 mobile phones, from 3 mobile phones, from 3 mobile phones, and from 2 mobile phone telecom in the above D name to 3G telecom, from December 26, 2008 to 208.

However, the Defendant had been aware that he would dispose of the above mobile phone as a “soverphone” if he did not repay the loan, and if he would be disposed of as a “soverphone”, he would not pay the mobile phone fee normally.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as above, is the Victim SK Telecom Co., Ltd., KT and corporation.

arrow