logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.04.22 2013고단2397
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On September 30, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud at the Gwangju District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Gwangju Prison on August 29, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

In collusion with B (Death around January 25, 2013), the Defendant conspiredd with B (Death on January 25, 2013), provided a lock for the victim C who had been living in the old-age, provided a mobile phone in the name of the victim with the payment of unpaid mobile phone charges, provided a victim with a harshly paying the victim with a mobile phone, sold the opened mobile phone as a 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's mobile phone', and conspired to receive a loan by deceiving the installment amount of the mobile phone and the user fee, or taking the loan.

1. Pursuant to the aforementioned conspiracy, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim C from the “E mobile phone agency” located in Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju, as the Defendant recruited as above, that “The victim C does not have any defect. If the mobile phone is created, the relationship of the charge should not be known to him/her.”

However, in fact, the Defendant had the mind of selling the victim's opened mobile phone with the 's inner phone', so even if the victim opens the mobile phone, the Defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the installment of the device or the mobile phone usage fee.

Around December 17, 2012, the Defendant conspired with B to induce the victim to use two cell phoness (F, G) at the SK Telecom agency, and after having KT agency open one cell phone (H) at the agency around December 20, 2012, the Defendant received it from the victim and sold it as a bitular phone, and the Defendant used one cell phone (I) used by the victim from the victim.

However, the Defendant did not pay the device cost and the user fee to which the victim was charged.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with the victim B and the victim.

arrow