beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, each of the above penalties shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The name bearer “E” means a person who committed a fraud with the Defendants from around January 2013 to December 2013, 2013. From January 2014 to August 2014, F means a person who committed a fraud with the Defendants and the Defendants. “E” and F means a person who, in general, took charge of the commission of the fraud, provides an office room, studio, etc. necessary for committing a crime with a total book, such as telephone, facsimile, facsimile, etc., and then distributes a text message or text message in the name of NHFF, and then, the Defendants, G, and H sent money to a person who was in charge of the telephone service and reported the above loan advertisement in the name of the Defendants to the “E” and “E” and “E” and “E” means to immediately withdraw money from the account under the name of the Defendants to the Defendant’s deposit account in the name of the NA as if the Defendants were to deposit money in the name of the Fund’s employee with the name of the Defendant’s “N” and to withdraw money from the account.
1. On December 30, 2013, the Defendants made a false statement to the victim J (or 40 years of age) who called the said advertisement in the officetel of the Busan KRGGGGGGGGGGG, stating that “In spite of the absence of the intent or ability to issue the marina passbook, if the Defendants are confirmed to be eligible for the issuance of the marina passbook, but deposit KRW 8 million in the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund, if they would have deposited KRW 60 million in the amount of the maximum amount, they would be issued to the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund.” Accordingly, the Defendants received KRW 8 million in the name of the guaranteed insurance premium from the victim on the same day as the new bank account (100-02-958768-2) in the name of the Republic of Korea (100-95878-2).
Accordingly, the Defendants are “E”, etc.