beta
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit
Suwon District Court 2012Guhap1526 (O4, 2012)
Case Number of the previous trial
National Tax Service Review and other 2011-0061 ( December 26, 2011)
Title
No error in determining that the issue amount of the instant case was not recovered to the Plaintiff
Summary
In terms of external appearance, the representative director embezzled the amount of the instant issue and returned it to the Plaintiff, and did not understand the act of final acquisition of the amount of the instant issue as a separate act, but did not err in determining that the amount of the instant issue was not recovered to the Plaintiff by being identified as a series of acts to achieve a single objective
Cases
2012Nu2241. Revocation of the disposition of revocation of notice of change in income amount
Plaintiff and appellant
AAAAPus, Inc.
Defendant, Appellant
Head of Sungnam Tax Office
Judgment of the first instance court
Suwon District Court Decision 2012Guhap1526 Decided June 14, 2012
Conclusion of Pleadings
April 12, 2013
Imposition of Judgment
May 10, 2013
Text
The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. On August 25, 201, the part of the defendant's disposition of 000 won belonging to the plaintiff on August 25, 201 against the plaintiff shall be revoked.
Reasons
The reasons for this decision are as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment. If so, and the plaintiff's request shall be dismissed due to the lack of reason, and the judgment of the first instance is just in accordance with this conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.