beta
Title
No error in determining that the issue amount of the instant case was not recovered to the Plaintiff
Summary
In terms of external appearance, the representative director embezzled the amount of the instant issue and returned it to the Plaintiff, and did not understand the act of final acquisition of the amount of the instant issue as a separate act, but did not err in determining that the amount of the instant issue was not recovered to the Plaintiff by being identified as a series of acts to achieve a single objective
Cases
2013Du11284. Revocation of the disposition of revocation of notice of change in income amount
Plaintiff-Appellant
TTT Co., Ltd.
Defendant-Appellee
Head of Sungnam Tax Office
Judgment of the lower court
Seoul High Court Decision 2012Nu2241 decided May 10, 2013
Imposition of Judgment
September 27, 2013
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
The plaintiff shall bear the costs of appeal.
Reasons
The record of this case and the original judgment and the grounds of appeal are examined, while it is clear that the grounds of appeal by the appellant fall under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, and the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.