Defendant

The appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (deficial person) The Defendant confirmed that all passengers waiting in the platform have boarded on the bus (hereinafter “the bus in this case”) and opened the entrance to depart from the platform. Since the passenger D attempted to board the bus in an unreasonable manner from the bus behind the bus in this case and attempted to board the bus in an unreasonable manner, it cannot be deemed that the Defendant driven the bus by means of causing danger to passengers in breach of his duty of care in the course of performing his duties.

Judgment

In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, (i) according to the report of the results of the investigation of black stuff images and traffic accident by the bus of this case, D’s attempt to board the bus of this case and the time interval between the time passengers boarding the bus of this case and the time passengers boarding the bus of this case. Thus, if the defendant confirmed the bus before opening the entrance, it seems that the existence of D was sufficiently known; (ii) the defendant was able to identify the bus of this case’s bus of this case’s bus of this case’s bus of this case’s bus of this case’s bus of this case’s bus of this case’s bus of this case’s bus of this case’s bus of this case’s bus of this case’s bus of this case’s bus of this case’s bus of this case’s bus of this case’s case’s bus of this case’s bus of this case’s last passenger of this case’s bus of this case’s bus of this case’s bus of this case’s last passenger of this case’s bus of this case’s bus of this case’s bus of this case’s.

Defendant

The argument is without merit.